Of Gods and Mortals and Empire
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Perspective Friday 21 February 2003
"To plunder, to slaughter, to steal, these things
they misname empire; and where they make a
wilderness, they call it peace."
- Tacitus It sounded like two behemoth icebergs colliding
in the North Atlantic, but you needed the right
kind of ears to hear it. Two immensely powerful
forces crashed into each other over the
weekend of February 15th, and the resulting
thunder has set the world to trembling. On one side were the people, who took to the
streets all across the world by the tens of
millions to stand against George W. Bush's
push for pre-emptive war on Iraq. The numbers,
and the locations, were staggering. More than
100,000 people took to the streets of Sydney,
Australia, a nation that has been solidly in
Bush's corner on this matter. In Spain, another
member of Bush's "Coalition of the Willing,"
several million protesters took over Madrid,
Barcelona and 55 other cities. Italy, another
Bush ally, saw over a million citizens take to the
streets of Rome. Britain, Bush's go/no go ally of
allies, saw over a million people protesting in
London. Police there said it was the largest
demonstration in that nation's long history. The Netherlands saw one hundred thousand
protesters, as did Belgium and Ireland. There
were protesters by the tens of thousands in
Sweden, Switzerland, Scotland, Denmark,
Austria, Canada, South Africa, Mexico, Greece,
Russia and Japan. 500,000 protesters
demonstrated in Germany, joined by three
members of Gerhard Schroder's cabinet who
defied their Chancellor by being there. It was the
largest demonstration ever in post-war
Germany. Another 500,000 people marched in
Paris and 60 other French cities. The United States of America saw protests from
coast to coast in over 100 cities nationwide.
New York City was paralyzed by over a million
marchers. San Francisco was taken over by well
over 200,000 protesters, and Los Angeles saw
over 100,000 people take to the streets.
Thousands upon thousands joined them in
Chicago, Philadelphia, Miami and Seattle. This was a gathering of ordinary citizens who
came together in the streets of the world in an
organized event that has no precedent in all of
human history. They were brought together by a
global word-of-mouth activism rooted entirely in
the Internet. Were it not for this planetary
connection, no such coordination could have
ever taken place. Once upon a time, the world
wide web was a realm dominated by dreams of
profit and marketing. Those dreams have
soured, leaving behind a marvelous network
now utilized by very average people who can,
with the click of a button, bring forth from all
points on the compass a roaring deluge of
humanity to stand against craven injustice and
ruinous war. The weekend of February 15th saw this force
ram headlong into the will of men who walk in
shadow, whose hands wield lightning and
steel, pestilence and famine. In their ranks
stand Presidents, Prime Ministers, corporate
magnates, untouchable billionaires, and the
advisors who whisper to them of empire and
domination. They are few in number, but life and
death flows from their fingertips in freshets and
gouts. These men control the armies and
navies of great nations, nuclear and chemical
nightmares beyond measure, unassailable
technological weapons and walls, the financial
cords which hold the package together, the
water, the air, the oil, the law, and a global
media machine by which they can obscure their
designs with pleasing lies. No mere citizen could do what these men in one
moment can do with the crooking of a little
finger. With a word, they can erase cities,
deprive an entire populace of water and light,
unleash disease and famine, annihilate the
economies of dozens of nations, and imprison
forever anyone who dares dissent. These men
bleed, they sicken, they die, but in their time of
life they can punch holes in the sky large
enough to make Zeus wince with envy. Like the
millions who marched, the gathering of such
fearful powers into the hands of so few is also
without precedent in all of human history. There was, among the millions who stormed
the planet last weekend, a misconception that
masked the true reason for their presence in the
streets. A great many people believe this
looming war with Iraq is about old grudges and
oil. There is logic in this; Iraq has the second
largest proven stores of precious petroleum in
the world, and there is a definite history of
malice between House Bush and House
Hussein. The truth of the matter is far more
broad and deep, belittling all talk of terrorism,
weapons of mass destruction, and even oil. The
men who pursue their goals by way of this war
have a great many desires on their minds, and
once more, they have the will to attain these
goals by whatever means is required. Were the protesters fully aware of whom they
faced, a good many of them may well have fled
in terror to cower in their homes. One does not
lightly bait a bear with such terrible claws. Does this all sound like some paranoid
fantasy? If so, allow me to introduce The Project
for the New American Century. The Project for the New American Century, or
PNAC, is a Washington-based think tank
created in 1997. Above all else, PNAC desires
and demands one thing: The establishment of a
global American empire to bend the will of all
nations. They chafe at the idea that the United
States, the last remaining superpower, does not
do more by way of economic and military force
to bring the rest of the world under the umbrella
of a new socio-economic Pax Americana. The fundamental essence of PNAC's ideology
can be found in a White Paper produced in
September of 2000 entitled "Rebuilding
America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and
Resources for a New Century." In it, PNAC
outlines what is required of America to create
the global empire they envision. According to
PNAC, America must:
* Reposition permanently based forces to
Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the
Middle East; * Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing
our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet
capabilities; * Develop and deploy a global missile defense
system, and develop a strategic dominance of
space; * Control the "International Commons" of
cyberspace; * Increase defense spending to a minimum of
3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from
the 3 percent currently spent. Most ominously, this PNAC document
described four "Core Missions" for the American
military. The two central requirements are for
American forces to "fight and decisively win
multiple, simultaneous major theater wars," and
to "perform the 'constabulary' duties associated
with shaping the security environment in critical
regions." Note well that PNAC does not want
America to be prepared to fight simultaneous
major wars. That is old school. In order to bring
this plan to fruition, the military must fight these
wars one way or the other to establish American
dominance for all to see. Why is this important? After all, wacky think
tanks are a cottage industry in Washington, DC.
They are a dime a dozen. In what way does
PNAC stand above the other groups that would
set American foreign policy if they could? Two events brought PNAC into the mainstream
of American government: the disputed election
of George W. Bush, and the attacks of
September 11th. When Bush assumed the
Presidency, the men who created and nurtured
the imperial dreams of PNAC became the men
who run the Pentagon, the Defense Department
and the White House. When the Towers came
down, these men saw, at long last, their chance
to turn their White Papers into substantive
policy. Vice President Dick Cheney is a founding
member of PNAC, along with Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld and Defense Policy Board
chairman Richard Perle. Deputy Defense
Secretary Paul Wolfowitz is the ideological father
of the group. Bruce Jackson, a PNAC director,
served as a Pentagon official for Ronald
Reagan before leaving government service to
take a leading position with the weapons
manufacturer Lockheed Martin. PNAC is staffed by men who previously served
with groups like Friends of the Democratic
Center in Central America, which supported
America's bloody gamesmanship in Nicaragua
and El Salvador, and with groups like The
Committee for the Present Danger, which spent
years advocating that a nuclear war with the
Soviet Union was "winnable." PNAC has recently given birth to a new group,
The Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, which
met with National Security Advisor Condoleezza
Rice in order to formulate a plan to "educate" the
American populace about the need for war in
Iraq. CLI has funneled millions of taxpayer
dollars to support the Iraqi National Congress
and the Iraqi heir presumptive, Ahmed Chalabi.
Chalabi was sentenced in absentia by a
Jordanian court in 1992 to 22 years in prison for
bank fraud after the collapse of Petra Bank,
which he founded in 1977. Chalabi has not set
foot in Iraq since 1956, but his Enron-like
business credentials apparently make him a
good match for the Bush administration's plans. PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report
is the institutionalization of plans and ideologies
that have been formulated for decades by the
men currently running American government.
The PNAC Statement of Principles is signed by
Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld, as well as by
Eliot Abrams, Jeb Bush, Bush's special envoy to
Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad, and many others.
William Kristol, famed conservative writer for the
Weekly Standard, is also a co-founder of the
group. The Weekly Standard is owned by
Ruppert Murdoch, who also owns international
media giant Fox News The desire for these freshly empowered PNAC
men to extend American hegemony by force of
arms across the globe has been there since
day one of the Bush administration, and is in no
small part a central reason for the Florida
electoral battle in 2000. Note that while many
have said that Gore and Bush are ideologically
identical, Mr. Gore had no ties whatsoever to the
fellows at PNAC. George W. Bush had to win
that election by any means necessary, and
PNAC signatory Jeb Bush was in the perfect
position to ensure the rise to prominence of his
fellow imperialists. Desire for such action,
however, is by no means translatable into
workable policy. Americans enjoy their comforts,
but don't cotton to the idea of being some sort of
Neo-Rome. On September 11th, the fellows from PNAC saw
a door of opportunity open wide before them,
and stormed right through it. Bush released on September 20th 2001 the
"National Security Strategy of the United States
of America." It is an ideological match to PNAC's
"Rebuilding America's Defenses" report issued
a year earlier. In many places, it uses exactly the
same language to describe America's new
place in the world. Recall that PNAC demanded
an increase in defense spending to at least
3.8% of GDP. Bush's proposed budget for next
year asks for $379 billion in defense spending,
almost exactly 3.8% of GDP. In August of 2002, Defense Policy Board
chairman and PNAC member Richard Perle
heard a policy briefing from a think tank
associated with the Rand Corporation.
According to the Washington Post and The
Nation, the final slide of this presentation
described "Iraq as the tactical pivot, Saudi
Arabia as the strategic pivot, and Egypt as the
prize" in a war that would purportedly be about
ridding the world of Saddam Hussein's
weapons. Bush has deployed massive forces
into the Mideast region, while simultaneously
engaging American forces in the Philippines
and playing nuclear chicken with North Korea.
Somewhere in all this lurks at least one of the
"major theater wars" desired by the September
2000 PNAC report. Iraq is but the beginning, a pretense for a wider
conflict. Donald Kagan, a central member of
PNAC, sees America establishing permanent
military bases in Iraq after the war. This is
purportedly a measure to defend the peace in
the Middle East, and to make sure the oil flows.
The nations in that region, however, will see this
for what it is: a jump-off point for American
forces to invade any nation in that region they
choose to. The American people, anxiously
awaiting some sort of exit plan after America
defeats Iraq, will see too late that no exit is
planned. All of the horses are traveling together at speed
here. The defense contractors who sup on
American tax revenue will be handsomely paid
for arming this new American empire. The
corporations that own the news media will sell
this eternal war at a profit, as viewership goes
through the stratosphere when there is combat
to be shown. Those within the administration
who believe that the defense of Israel is
contingent upon laying waste to every possible
aggressor in the region will have their dreams
fulfilled. The PNAC men who wish for a global
Pax Americana at gunpoint will see their plans
unfold. Through it all, the bankrollers from the
WTO and the IMF will be able to dictate financial
terms to the entire planet. This last aspect of the
plan is pivotal, and is best described in the
newly revised version of Greg Palast's
masterpiece, "The Best Democracy Money Can
Buy." There will be adverse side effects. The siege
mentality average Americans are suffering as
they smother behind yards of plastic sheeting
and duct tape will increase by orders of
magnitude as our aggressions bring forth new
terrorist attacks against the homeland. These
attacks will require the implementation of the
newly drafted Patriot Act II, an augmentation of
the previous Act that has profoundly sharper
teeth. The sun will set on the Constitution and
Bill of Rights. The American economy will be ravaged by the
need for increased defense spending, and by
the aforementioned "constabulary" duties in
Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. Former allies
will turn on us. Germany, France and the other
nations resisting this Iraq war are fully aware of
this game plan. They are not acting out of
cowardice or because they love Saddam
Hussein, but because they mean to resist this
rising American empire, lest they face economic
and military serfdom at the hands of George W.
Bush. Richard Perle has already stated that
France is no longer an American ally. As the
eagle spreads its wings, our rhetoric and their
resistance will become more agitated and
dangerous. Many people, of course, will die. They will die
from war and from want, from famine and
disease. At home, the social fabric will be torn in
ways that make the Reagan nightmares of crack
addiction, homelessness and AIDS seem tame
by comparison. This is the price to be paid for empire, and the
men of PNAC who now control the fate and
future of America are more than willing to pay it.
For them, the benefits far outweigh the
liabilities. The plan was running smoothly until those two
icebergs collided. Millions and millions of
ordinary people are making it very difficult for
Bush's international allies to keep to the script.
PNAC may have designs for the control of the
"International Commons" of the internet, but for
now it is the staging ground for a movement that
would see empire take a back seat to a wise
peace, human rights, equal protection under the
law, and the preponderance of a justice that will,
if properly applied, do away forever with the
anger and hatred that gives birth to terrorism in
the first place. Tommaso Palladini of Milan perhaps said it
best as he marched with his countrymen in
Rome. "You fight terrorism," he said, "by
creating more justice in the world." The People versus the Powerful is the oldest
story in human history. At no point in history
have the Powerful wielded so much control. At
no point in history has the active and informed
involvement of the People, all of them, been
more absolutely required. The tide can be
stopped, and the men who desire empire by the
sword can be thwarted. It has already begun,
but it must not cease. These are men of will,
and they do not intend to fail. ------- William Rivers Pitt is a New York Times
bestselling author of two books - "War On Iraq"
(with Scott Ritter) available now from Context
Books, and "The Greatest Sedition is Silence,"
available in May 2003 from Pluto Press. He
teaches high school in Boston, MA. Scott Lowery contributed research to this report. Print This Story E-mail This Story
B
Baerwald
(view)
Of Gods and Mortals and Empire
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Perspective Friday 21 February 2003
"To plunder, to slaughter, to steal, these things
they misname empire; and where they make a
wilderness, they call it peace."
- Tacitus It sounded like two behemoth icebergs colliding
in the North Atlantic, but you needed the right
kind of ears to hear it. Two immensely powerful
forces crashed into each other over the
weekend of February 15th, and the resulting
thunder has set the world to trembling. On one side were the people, who took to the
streets all across the world by the tens of
millions to stand against George W. Bush's
push for pre-emptive war on Iraq. The numbers,
and the locations, were staggering. More than
100,000 people took to the streets of Sydney,
Australia, a nation that has been solidly in
Bush's corner on this matter. In Spain, another
member of Bush's "Coalition of the Willing,"
several million protesters took over Madrid,
Barcelona and 55 other cities. Italy, another
Bush ally, saw over a million citizens take to the
streets of Rome. Britain, Bush's go/no go ally of
allies, saw over a million people protesting in
London. Police there said it was the largest
demonstration in that nation's long history. The Netherlands saw one hundred thousand
protesters, as did Belgium and Ireland. There
were protesters by the tens of thousands in
Sweden, Switzerland, Scotland, Denmark,
Austria, Canada, South Africa, Mexico, Greece,
Russia and Japan. 500,000 protesters
demonstrated in Germany, joined by three
members of Gerhard Schroder's cabinet who
defied their Chancellor by being there. It was the
largest demonstration ever in post-war
Germany. Another 500,000 people marched in
Paris and 60 other French cities. The United States of America saw protests from
coast to coast in over 100 cities nationwide.
New York City was paralyzed by over a million
marchers. San Francisco was taken over by well
over 200,000 protesters, and Los Angeles saw
over 100,000 people take to the streets.
Thousands upon thousands joined them in
Chicago, Philadelphia, Miami and Seattle. This was a gathering of ordinary citizens who
came together in the streets of the world in an
organized event that has no precedent in all of
human history. They were brought together by a
global word-of-mouth activism rooted entirely in
the Internet. Were it not for this planetary
connection, no such coordination could have
ever taken place. Once upon a time, the world
wide web was a realm dominated by dreams of
profit and marketing. Those dreams have
soured, leaving behind a marvelous network
now utilized by very average people who can,
with the click of a button, bring forth from all
points on the compass a roaring deluge of
humanity to stand against craven injustice and
ruinous war. The weekend of February 15th saw this force
ram headlong into the will of men who walk in
shadow, whose hands wield lightning and
steel, pestilence and famine. In their ranks
stand Presidents, Prime Ministers, corporate
magnates, untouchable billionaires, and the
advisors who whisper to them of empire and
domination. They are few in number, but life and
death flows from their fingertips in freshets and
gouts. These men control the armies and
navies of great nations, nuclear and chemical
nightmares beyond measure, unassailable
technological weapons and walls, the financial
cords which hold the package together, the
water, the air, the oil, the law, and a global
media machine by which they can obscure their
designs with pleasing lies. No mere citizen could do what these men in one
moment can do with the crooking of a little
finger. With a word, they can erase cities,
deprive an entire populace of water and light,
unleash disease and famine, annihilate the
economies of dozens of nations, and imprison
forever anyone who dares dissent. These men
bleed, they sicken, they die, but in their time of
life they can punch holes in the sky large
enough to make Zeus wince with envy. Like the
millions who marched, the gathering of such
fearful powers into the hands of so few is also
without precedent in all of human history. There was, among the millions who stormed
the planet last weekend, a misconception that
masked the true reason for their presence in the
streets. A great many people believe this
looming war with Iraq is about old grudges and
oil. There is logic in this; Iraq has the second
largest proven stores of precious petroleum in
the world, and there is a definite history of
malice between House Bush and House
Hussein. The truth of the matter is far more
broad and deep, belittling all talk of terrorism,
weapons of mass destruction, and even oil. The
men who pursue their goals by way of this war
have a great many desires on their minds, and
once more, they have the will to attain these
goals by whatever means is required. Were the protesters fully aware of whom they
faced, a good many of them may well have fled
in terror to cower in their homes. One does not
lightly bait a bear with such terrible claws. Does this all sound like some paranoid
fantasy? If so, allow me to introduce The Project
for the New American Century. The Project for the New American Century, or
PNAC, is a Washington-based think tank
created in 1997. Above all else, PNAC desires
and demands one thing: The establishment of a
global American empire to bend the will of all
nations. They chafe at the idea that the United
States, the last remaining superpower, does not
do more by way of economic and military force
to bring the rest of the world under the umbrella
of a new socio-economic Pax Americana. The fundamental essence of PNAC's ideology
can be found in a White Paper produced in
September of 2000 entitled "Rebuilding
America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and
Resources for a New Century." In it, PNAC
outlines what is required of America to create
the global empire they envision. According to
PNAC, America must:
* Reposition permanently based forces to
Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the
Middle East; * Modernize U.S. forces, including enhancing
our fighter aircraft, submarine and surface fleet
capabilities; * Develop and deploy a global missile defense
system, and develop a strategic dominance of
space; * Control the "International Commons" of
cyberspace; * Increase defense spending to a minimum of
3.8 percent of gross domestic product, up from
the 3 percent currently spent. Most ominously, this PNAC document
described four "Core Missions" for the American
military. The two central requirements are for
American forces to "fight and decisively win
multiple, simultaneous major theater wars," and
to "perform the 'constabulary' duties associated
with shaping the security environment in critical
regions." Note well that PNAC does not want
America to be prepared to fight simultaneous
major wars. That is old school. In order to bring
this plan to fruition, the military must fight these
wars one way or the other to establish American
dominance for all to see. Why is this important? After all, wacky think
tanks are a cottage industry in Washington, DC.
They are a dime a dozen. In what way does
PNAC stand above the other groups that would
set American foreign policy if they could? Two events brought PNAC into the mainstream
of American government: the disputed election
of George W. Bush, and the attacks of
September 11th. When Bush assumed the
Presidency, the men who created and nurtured
the imperial dreams of PNAC became the men
who run the Pentagon, the Defense Department
and the White House. When the Towers came
down, these men saw, at long last, their chance
to turn their White Papers into substantive
policy. Vice President Dick Cheney is a founding
member of PNAC, along with Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld and Defense Policy Board
chairman Richard Perle. Deputy Defense
Secretary Paul Wolfowitz is the ideological father
of the group. Bruce Jackson, a PNAC director,
served as a Pentagon official for Ronald
Reagan before leaving government service to
take a leading position with the weapons
manufacturer Lockheed Martin. PNAC is staffed by men who previously served
with groups like Friends of the Democratic
Center in Central America, which supported
America's bloody gamesmanship in Nicaragua
and El Salvador, and with groups like The
Committee for the Present Danger, which spent
years advocating that a nuclear war with the
Soviet Union was "winnable." PNAC has recently given birth to a new group,
The Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, which
met with National Security Advisor Condoleezza
Rice in order to formulate a plan to "educate" the
American populace about the need for war in
Iraq. CLI has funneled millions of taxpayer
dollars to support the Iraqi National Congress
and the Iraqi heir presumptive, Ahmed Chalabi.
Chalabi was sentenced in absentia by a
Jordanian court in 1992 to 22 years in prison for
bank fraud after the collapse of Petra Bank,
which he founded in 1977. Chalabi has not set
foot in Iraq since 1956, but his Enron-like
business credentials apparently make him a
good match for the Bush administration's plans. PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report
is the institutionalization of plans and ideologies
that have been formulated for decades by the
men currently running American government.
The PNAC Statement of Principles is signed by
Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld, as well as by
Eliot Abrams, Jeb Bush, Bush's special envoy to
Afghanistan Zalmay Khalilzad, and many others.
William Kristol, famed conservative writer for the
Weekly Standard, is also a co-founder of the
group. The Weekly Standard is owned by
Ruppert Murdoch, who also owns international
media giant Fox News The desire for these freshly empowered PNAC
men to extend American hegemony by force of
arms across the globe has been there since
day one of the Bush administration, and is in no
small part a central reason for the Florida
electoral battle in 2000. Note that while many
have said that Gore and Bush are ideologically
identical, Mr. Gore had no ties whatsoever to the
fellows at PNAC. George W. Bush had to win
that election by any means necessary, and
PNAC signatory Jeb Bush was in the perfect
position to ensure the rise to prominence of his
fellow imperialists. Desire for such action,
however, is by no means translatable into
workable policy. Americans enjoy their comforts,
but don't cotton to the idea of being some sort of
Neo-Rome. On September 11th, the fellows from PNAC saw
a door of opportunity open wide before them,
and stormed right through it. Bush released on September 20th 2001 the
"National Security Strategy of the United States
of America." It is an ideological match to PNAC's
"Rebuilding America's Defenses" report issued
a year earlier. In many places, it uses exactly the
same language to describe America's new
place in the world. Recall that PNAC demanded
an increase in defense spending to at least
3.8% of GDP. Bush's proposed budget for next
year asks for $379 billion in defense spending,
almost exactly 3.8% of GDP. In August of 2002, Defense Policy Board
chairman and PNAC member Richard Perle
heard a policy briefing from a think tank
associated with the Rand Corporation.
According to the Washington Post and The
Nation, the final slide of this presentation
described "Iraq as the tactical pivot, Saudi
Arabia as the strategic pivot, and Egypt as the
prize" in a war that would purportedly be about
ridding the world of Saddam Hussein's
weapons. Bush has deployed massive forces
into the Mideast region, while simultaneously
engaging American forces in the Philippines
and playing nuclear chicken with North Korea.
Somewhere in all this lurks at least one of the
"major theater wars" desired by the September
2000 PNAC report. Iraq is but the beginning, a pretense for a wider
conflict. Donald Kagan, a central member of
PNAC, sees America establishing permanent
military bases in Iraq after the war. This is
purportedly a measure to defend the peace in
the Middle East, and to make sure the oil flows.
The nations in that region, however, will see this
for what it is: a jump-off point for American
forces to invade any nation in that region they
choose to. The American people, anxiously
awaiting some sort of exit plan after America
defeats Iraq, will see too late that no exit is
planned. All of the horses are traveling together at speed
here. The defense contractors who sup on
American tax revenue will be handsomely paid
for arming this new American empire. The
corporations that own the news media will sell
this eternal war at a profit, as viewership goes
through the stratosphere when there is combat
to be shown. Those within the administration
who believe that the defense of Israel is
contingent upon laying waste to every possible
aggressor in the region will have their dreams
fulfilled. The PNAC men who wish for a global
Pax Americana at gunpoint will see their plans
unfold. Through it all, the bankrollers from the
WTO and the IMF will be able to dictate financial
terms to the entire planet. This last aspect of the
plan is pivotal, and is best described in the
newly revised version of Greg Palast's
masterpiece, "The Best Democracy Money Can
Buy." There will be adverse side effects. The siege
mentality average Americans are suffering as
they smother behind yards of plastic sheeting
and duct tape will increase by orders of
magnitude as our aggressions bring forth new
terrorist attacks against the homeland. These
attacks will require the implementation of the
newly drafted Patriot Act II, an augmentation of
the previous Act that has profoundly sharper
teeth. The sun will set on the Constitution and
Bill of Rights. The American economy will be ravaged by the
need for increased defense spending, and by
the aforementioned "constabulary" duties in
Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. Former allies
will turn on us. Germany, France and the other
nations resisting this Iraq war are fully aware of
this game plan. They are not acting out of
cowardice or because they love Saddam
Hussein, but because they mean to resist this
rising American empire, lest they face economic
and military serfdom at the hands of George W.
Bush. Richard Perle has already stated that
France is no longer an American ally. As the
eagle spreads its wings, our rhetoric and their
resistance will become more agitated and
dangerous. Many people, of course, will die. They will die
from war and from want, from famine and
disease. At home, the social fabric will be torn in
ways that make the Reagan nightmares of crack
addiction, homelessness and AIDS seem tame
by comparison. This is the price to be paid for empire, and the
men of PNAC who now control the fate and
future of America are more than willing to pay it.
For them, the benefits far outweigh the
liabilities. The plan was running smoothly until those two
icebergs collided. Millions and millions of
ordinary people are making it very difficult for
Bush's international allies to keep to the script.
PNAC may have designs for the control of the
"International Commons" of the internet, but for
now it is the staging ground for a movement that
would see empire take a back seat to a wise
peace, human rights, equal protection under the
law, and the preponderance of a justice that will,
if properly applied, do away forever with the
anger and hatred that gives birth to terrorism in
the first place. Tommaso Palladini of Milan perhaps said it
best as he marched with his countrymen in
Rome. "You fight terrorism," he said, "by
creating more justice in the world." The People versus the Powerful is the oldest
story in human history. At no point in history
have the Powerful wielded so much control. At
no point in history has the active and informed
involvement of the People, all of them, been
more absolutely required. The tide can be
stopped, and the men who desire empire by the
sword can be thwarted. It has already begun,
but it must not cease. These are men of will,
and they do not intend to fail. ------- William Rivers Pitt is a New York Times
bestselling author of two books - "War On Iraq"
(with Scott Ritter) available now from Context
Books, and "The Greatest Sedition is Silence,"
available in May 2003 from Pluto Press. He
teaches high school in Boston, MA. Scott Lowery contributed research to this report. Print This Story E-mail This Story
